Wakeel Higher Secondary School Khan Garh ( Muzaffargarh )
Muzaffar Garh · Institution code 32336637
Your institution at a glance
Published regular institution statistics, gazette pages 18–60
Unavailable listed · Unavailable absent · Unavailable cancelled. Absent and cancelled candidates are excluded from appeared.
11th and 12th · 2026
Same institution code · each class uses its own board and district references
| Examination | Appeared | Passed | School % | District % | Board % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11th · Part I | 65 | 21 | 32.31% | 66.28%33.97 pp below | 66.06%33.75 pp below |
| 12th · HSSC | 144 | 63 | 43.75% | 77.33%33.58 pp below | 73.19%29.44 pp below |
12th compared with 11th: 11.44 pp above
Different students and exam scopes: this is not a progress score or year-on-year improvement.
11th references follow each report’s published or explicitly labelled derived source. 12th references retain the existing reviewed linked-result population; they differ from published gazette headlines.
More details · Log in to AnalyticsPrepare your seating plan
Organise examination rooms, arrange seats and prepare printable plans.
Open Seating PlanBuild your school timetable
Create class and teacher timetables, generate schedules and manage cover.
Open TimetableWhat is behind your results?
Compare colleges and subjects, check performance against board and district references, and inspect the coverage behind each figure.
- Compare up to three selections side by side
- Compare overall results or choose an available subject
- Inspect available marks averages and percentage-point differences
The signed-in service offers reviewed 12th-class analytics, subject-combination filters and saved analyses. The D.G. Khan 11th-class comparison below is available without an account; it does not save analyses.
Group results
Available institution groups · First Annual 2026
| Group | Appeared | Passed | School % | District group % | Board group % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Medical | 15 | 6 | 40.00% | 78.96%38.96 pp below | UnavailableComparison unavailable |
| Pre-Engineering | 6 | 3 | 50.00% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | UnavailableComparison unavailable |
| General Science | 22 | 9 | 40.91% | 66.36%25.45 pp below | UnavailableComparison unavailable |
| Humanities | 22 | 3 | 13.64% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | UnavailableComparison unavailable |
Group references pool published institution counts within the district or board. Private candidates are excluded. Pass percentages are calculated from total passed ÷ total appeared, not averaged across schools.
Overall outcomes
Available overall outcomes · institution source population
Available source outcomes are shown here. Unavailable values are kept separate from zero. Grade definitions and availability differ between boards.
Subject results
Part I · pass percentages for the same subject
| Subject | Appeared | Passed | Pass % | District % | Board % | Average % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabic2 subject records | 2 | 2 | 100.00% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 99.53%0.47 pp above | 95.00% |
| Biology15 subject records | 14 | 9 | 64.29% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 88.23%23.95 pp below | 49.41% |
| Chemistry21 subject records | 21 | 12 | 57.14% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 85.37%28.23 pp below | 41.85% |
| Civics2 subject records | 2 | 2 | 100.00% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 98.43%1.57 pp above | 70.00% |
| Computer Science41 subject records | 40 | 24 | 60.00% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 35.23% |
| Economics14 subject records | 12 | 8 | 66.67% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 90.87%24.20 pp below | 41.50% |
| Education24 subject records | 24 | 21 | 87.50% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 96.53%9.03 pp below | 55.13% |
| English78 subject records | 78 | 49 | 62.82% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 89.93%27.11 pp below | 40.03% |
| Geography1 subject records | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 98.64%1.36 pp above | 70.59% |
| Islamic Education78 subject records | 77 | 77 | 100.00% | UnavailableComparison unavailable | 99.81%0.19 pp above | 81.87% |
Subject detail uses the broader candidate population linked to the printed institution banner, not the published regular-institution population. The source does not identify each candidate’s regular/private enrolment. Subject and overall figures therefore describe different populations; this linkage does not prove current enrolment. Gaps are percentage points (pp). Minor unresolved counts are available in coverage details.
Subject coverage details
Across the displayed subject rows: 0 unresolved results (subject records, not unique students). Missing and notice-bearing results are excluded from pass/fail denominators and averages; absent values are not zero.
District subject figures require exact links to institutions. Read source notes for coverage and population differences.
Sources & coverage
80 linked marksheets / 80 gazette records for this institution.
Minor unresolved outcomes
Unavailable other overall outcomes in this institution. Subject-level unresolved results remain in coverage counts and do not become passes or failures.
Board headline and six district totals are published all-candidate statistics: 51,210 appeared / 33,830 passed. Districts sum exactly to the board.
The 287 published institution rows and 990 group rows cover regular candidates: 48,484 appeared / 32,288 passed in the regular source population. Two institution pass totals and some group cells are blank; original blanks remain unknown. Every known institution metric reconciles to its disjoint known group counts.
For institution codes 3213602 and 32110004 only, the primary summary is a linked-marksheet fallback population because the published regular pass total is blank: respectively 7 appeared / 2 passed and 5 appeared / 0 passed in their broader printed-banner populations. Both passed and appeared use that same linked population. Exact gazette PASS and REAPPEAR verdicts establish all 12 fallback outcomes; relative grades are not verdicts. Original published regular appeared counts (5 and 4) remain separately preserved; they are not mixed into these fallback rates.
Subject detail uses the broader candidate population linked to the printed institution banner, not the published regular-institution population. The source does not identify each candidate’s regular/private enrolment. Subject and overall figures therefore describe different populations; this linkage does not prove current enrolment.
All 52,298 roster entries have a unique validated marksheet link. The 358,468 detailed subject rows cover 51,187 cards; 1,111 status-only responses contain no subject rows.
Subject outcomes use exact gazette PASS verdicts and complete REAPPEAR deficiency lists, joined to the same validated marksheet. All 28,970 listed deficiencies match exactly one current-card subject, including 1,589 absent subject observations; absence remains separate from the numeric pass/fail denominator. The cards print RELATIVE GRADE, not a subject result verdict. No letter grade or generic mark threshold determines a pass or failure.
A full audit found 667 numeric deficiencies with relative grades E, D+ or D, plus 12 deficient numeric zeroes with blank grades. These are failures according to the exact gazette deficiency lists. Numeric marks and averages are unchanged. Administrative and notice-bearing rows remain unresolved coverage.
Subject rows for gazette administrative statuses (including mark-bearing administrative notes, award pending, result withheld and wrong roll number) remain in coverage and are excluded from ordinary pass/fail denominators and numeric averages. No status or missing mark becomes zero.
The published headline passes equal 33,795 plain PASS entries plus 35 MARKS_WITH_NOTE entries. Broader linked outcomes retain that source distinction. Primary institution and district counts are reproduced from their published tables.
Class 11 district assignments retain reviewed exact-code and identical-name Class 12 evidence only where it does not conflict with the newly separate Taunsa Sharif scope. Unsupported current assignments remain unassigned; no district is inferred from a similar institution name.
Class 12 comparisons use the existing reviewed same-code linked-result export and their original district scope. They are different cohorts/exams and populations, not student progression or a matched longitudinal cohort.
Published subject-by-group statistics are retained separately with group scope. A separate board-reference set pools identical published labels across five explicitly disjoint exam groups, using summed passed / summed appeared. The seven REGULAR/PRIVATE group totals exclude overlapping ALL totals and reconcile exactly to the board headline. Every pooled reference retains its contributing original group rows; no name alias joins different labels. Marksheet subject aggregates retain printed card labels.
Prepared 23/10/2026. Warehouse exam 35 · validated marksheet batch 370. Read-only aggregate export.